Test your Agentic, RAG, and Chatbot apps continuously to catch regressions before they ship, with automation that lets your QA team own AI testing at scale.
You already run QA on traditional software. TestSavant.AI gives you the practice, coverage, and evidence to run it on non-deterministic, LLM-based AI applications.
Every model update, prompt edit, and data refresh can degrade your AI without anyone noticing.
TestSavant.AI runs your test plans on a repeatable cadence, scheduled or triggered from your CI/CD pipeline. The failure-rate trend across runs tells you whether your AI is improving or getting worse, and category and policy-label views pinpoint a regression as soon as it appears.
Reliability is tracked run over run, so a gradual decline shows up well before it reaches users.
Schedule them daily, weekly, or monthly, or fire them automatically when a model version or prompt is updated.
A failing run blocks the release, like any other pipeline check.
Twenty evaluators come pre-built and ready to run, so your QA team has coverage on day one. Each one targets a specific way your AI can go wrong, mapped to your application type. Or create your own evaluators, without writing a single line of code.
Does your agent complete the task, in the format you specified, while keeping its instructions to itself?
Does your system answer from your sources, and only your sources?
The risks that cut across everything you ship.
If you prompt a general-purpose LLM for test cases, you get generic tests that won't fit your app.
With TestSavant, every run makes the next run smarter.
The TestSavant adaptive generator writes application-specific test cases, each tuned to risks in your system. The engine studies the results and aims the next batch at the high-risk categories where your application is failing, exposing your weakest points.
Because testing concentrates on your highest-risk categories, your test budget is only spent where it matters most. You can even preview the projected cost before you commit to a full run.
Wrap your live AI calls with guardrails to enforce the behavior you expect.
When testing turns up a failure, feed those cases back in to strengthen the guardrail that handles them.
See runtime guardrails →from testsavant.guard import InputGuard, OutputGuard
input_guard = InputGuard(api_key=API_KEY, project_id=PROJECT_ID)
output_guard = OutputGuard(api_key=API_KEY, project_id=PROJECT_ID)
prompt = "Summarize the latest release train for executives."
if input_guard.scan(prompt).is_valid:
completion = llm.generate(prompt)
verdict = output_guard.scan(prompt=prompt, output=completion)
if verdict.is_valid:
ship(completion)
else:
escalate(verdict.results)
A working AI testing program runs the same loop on every release, and TestSavant.AI covers each step. AI testing finds the failures, runtime guardrails enforce the fix, re-runs show the trend, and every run leaves evidence you can hand up.
Anyone can vibecode an evaluator. The hard part is the program that turns your testing into a practice you can run on every release.
Developer and prompt tools help you build and observe your AI.
TestSavant.AI is built in QA's language for the team that owns the decision to ship, where releases get tested, gated, and signed off.
You push a model upgrade and the failure rate climbs. The trend report flags it on the next run, so the regression never reaches a user.
A live request tries to pull your system prompt. The guardrail blocks it and logs the policy it broke, the input that triggered it, and the configuration that caught it.
Every run produces a report you can export: a plain-language risk summary your QA lead hands to compliance or an exec to approve the release.
Book a walkthrough with our team and see the full methodology on an agentic, RAG, or chatbot use case like yours.
Enterprise Grade AI Testing and Guardrails for Generative AI and Agentic Applications